Democrats = KKK and Filibusterism. While North won using industrial money and fully support of Rockefeller the Democrats in the South were the link to search and destroy any opposition (then in Germany will called the Brown shirts, NAZIS).
Rockefeller found that the biggest amount of Petroleum is still in the South: from Oklahoma through all the Gulf and Texas.
Rockefeller wanted to expand his monopoly and control all politics.
The slavery got a new front: the Americas, starting in Nicaragua and still Democrats tried to do it with FSLN and socialist revolution paid and organized by the IPS, Institut for Political Sciences, a division of the CIA controlled by Democratic Party.
That new slavery model is called Filibusterism.
Historic Elements:
#1. Civil war in the USA, North and South used black slaves.
#2. The North discovers Petroleum and Rockefeller takes the monopoly.
#3. Rockefeller searches for the largest deposits and discovers from Oklahoma to Texas are the largest reserves.
#4. Vanderbilt and Rockefeller finance the War against the South, explaining that the South is not industrial and lacks money to eliminate slavery.
#5. The North wins, and the Democrats take power with the populist discourse of Andrew Jackson justify taking the lands of the South, and eliminating the scalvity.
# 6. The Democrats with their President Franklin Pierce decide to extend a model of imperial Mercantilism and to conquer militarily the Americas or Latin America, but also taking by slaves to their inhabitants: that is to say FILIBUSTERISM and for this they use the liberal ones like the Liberals of Leon To give its entrance to countries like Nicaragua.
# 7. A model to create and never to break. The idea is to always blame others.
# 8. Blaming the South of Racism, Trump of Supremacy, the Nazis being right-wing, when both the Nazis and Marxists, Communists, Socialists and Progressives are all on the LEFT.
Fascism and Nazism change in their forms of production of goods, but both are controlled by the State.
The State is controlled by the Party, and by the Party an elite group.
The North wanted a monopoly and one as great as possible, so that the South had its aspirations in the economy was already something negative for Cornelius Vanderbilt, John Davison Rockefeller, and Andrew Carnegie, because it was the business in MANO SUNICAS by the oil, the Steel and railways.
Having all the money, for the whole industry for the whole country would be a much more lucrative business if they could put it in their hands and under their contorol to the South.
And so they did, who today says something of US expansionism? Of imperial expansionism over the Philippines, Hawaii, Puerto Rico, etc. whose projects that eliminated the freedom of other peoples like Nicaragua with filibusterism paid for precisely these “HEROES” of the North (Unionists):
Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, of which the migrants should be asked to delineate the Rockefeller Foundation, the statues and financial centers that financed the elimination of the liberty of so many peoples outside the USA, and the promotion of economic inequality within the USA with its Economic and Monopolies. Blessed is the ignorance, because of it live the Democrats.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_D._Rockefeller
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelius_Vanderbilt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Carnegie
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln
USA North vs South: (Industrial Millionaires + Populism) vs (Agricultural Economy and last in getting petroleum).
We may explain with this example: (Robots instead of slaves, and North vs Poor regions)
Stage 1. North and South both got slaves and made their Economy using slavery labour force.
Stage2. North became richer and therefore industrial which implies less human work.
Stage 3. North wants to extend their model to the South giving no financing, but controlling their economies.
Stage 4. South cannot simply give their lands in exchange of nothing, South wants to become a new Nation.
Stage 5. North wants war in order to make a bigger nation under their rules using their bigger amount of money from industry.
Stage 6. North won the war and impose their conditions over the South.
Now let;s play with substitution of elements:
Employees (industry, manufacturing, service, Doctors in Medicine, etc ) for ROBOTS.
North will be Rich Countries.
South will be poor countries.
Result?
Those countries in the South must have robots instead of employees because it is the abuse of man over other man,
If South does not want or not capable to have the money to substitute ROBOTS for employees in the next 5 years,
then North must attack military to South and take all their land, and declare the emancipation of employees, This way employees will be free man, and no more low salaries under $15 USD.
All lands in the South will belong to a bigger Nation called the All North.
It is not that the NORTH has never got slaves. North got tons of money with slaves, but Industry change their way of produce.
The states of the North, meanwhile, one by one had gradually abolished slavery. A steady flow of immigrants, especially from Ireland and Germany during the potato famine of the 1840s and 1850s, insured the North a ready pool of laborers, many of whom could be hired at low wages, diminishing the need to cling to the institution of slavery.
LOW wages to me is the same of slavery, they pay salaries, correct?
North simply impose with no gradually way of change for the South or showing the money for the change become gradually abolished.
North just show a way to take advantage over the South to kill their agrarian economies and become the new Large Land Owners.
Abraham Lincoln of Illinois, Republican Party: 39.8%
Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, Northern Democratic Party: 29.5%
John C. Breckenridge of Kentucky, Southern Democratic Party: 18.1%
John Bell of Tennessee, Constitutional Union Party: 12.6%
DEMOCRATS and populism:
In 1834, Vanderbilt competed on the Hudson River against a steamboat monopoly between New York City and Albany. Using the name “The People’s Line,” he used the populist language associated with Democratic president Andrew Jackson to get popular support for his business. At the end of the year, the monopoly paid him a large amount to stop competing, and he switched his operations to Long Island Sound
Just imagine the North with no TEXAS and no control of the Gulf?
Without the South, how would they have contracts with the Government to build railway lines to transport oil?
What would the South be if it were South who would first discover the oil?
For the South would have eliminated slavery first, and the War would have won the South, and Rockefeller would be a simple fanatic Baptist.
Kansas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, North Louisiana and the part of Texas from the Gulf Coast was not developed until the discovery of Oil in 1892, but it was already an area and business monopolized and controlled by North archimonarios like Rockefeller and the Successors of Vanderbilt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_petroleum_industry_in_the_United_States
The FLAG is not supremacist but rather the NATION of the SOUTHERN UNION, which was reluctant to surrender its lands and riches to the North, ROCKEFELLER and Vanderbilt financed the war against the South.
Why? For money, power and control.
Control of railroad lines, money generated by the monopolies of Steel, and oil. Why use the excuse of slavery in the South? Simple, the North had already made their money with slaves, and first found the oil in the North, but they realized that the largest unexploited reserves were in the South (Kansas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, North Louisiana and Texas)
They could not afford a new country to start exploring oil without Rockefeller. Rockefeller needed not only to take the South, but to control his agrarian policy, and after a war with so much superiority of the north managed to kill record number with which many land of the South was in direct hands of ROCKEFELLER and its new partners. Remember, NOBODY is interested in slaves, everything was Jacksonian populism, sponsored with the largest amount of money available.
The real fascists, however, knew that they were on the political left. Mussolini—the original fascist leader, who came to power a decade before Hitler—was a Marxist who saw fascism as the most effective way to implement socialism.
Hitler was so committed to socialism that he changed the name of the German Workers Party to the National Socialist German Workers Party. As historian Anthony James Gregor points out, all the original founders of fascism—in Italy, in Germany, in England and in France—were socialists and leftists. So what did Hitler learn from the Democratic Party and from his fellow leftists in America? First, he credited his plan of lebensraum or “living space”—specifically, his plan to forcibly seize the land in Russia, Poland and Eastern Europe, and enslave the native inhabitants—to the Jacksonian Democrats.
In a 1928 speech, Hitler noted that Americans in the Jacksonian Era had “gunned down the millions of Redskins to a few hundred thousand, and now keep the modest remnant under observation in a cage.” Far from objecting to this precedent, Hitler intended to emulate it. As historian Norman Rich put it, “The United States policy of westward expansion in the course of which the white men ruthlessly thrust aside the ‘inferior’ indigenous populations served as the model for Hitler’s entire conception of lebensraum.”
Historian Timothy Snyder makes the same point in Bloodlands, “As Hitler imagined the future, Germany would deal with the Slavs much as the North Americans had dealt with the Indians.” Using a formula developed by the Democrats, Hitler sought to drive the Poles, Russians and Slavs from their land; dispatch Germans to take it over; and enslave the conquered peoples that refused to leave.
Notice that Rich and Snyder, who are both progressives, never mentioned the term “Democrat.” They are content to say that Hitler got his ideas from the white man, or from the North Americans. Yet it was the Democratic Party under its founder, Andrew Jackson, and then under Jackson’s Democratic successors, that massacred the Indians and drove them west and presided over the ignominious Trail of Tears. This is the actual precedent that Hitler appealed to in formulating his plans of conquest, dispossession and enslavement.
The second lesson Hitler learned from the Democrats was how to create a racist state. The Nazis believed they were creating the world’s first racist regime, but they soon discovered that the Democrats of the American South had—at least on the regional level—beaten them to it. Consequently, Hitler and the Nazis derived valuable lessons about how to implement discriminatory laws.
“It was with the passage of the Nuremberg Laws in 1935,” historian George Fredrickson writes, “that Germany became a full-fledged racist regime. American laws were the main precedents for such legislation.” While Fredrickson—another progressive scholar—blames “American” laws for inspiring the Nuremberg legislation, what he means specifically is the Democratic Party’s Jim Crow laws.
Let’s remember that every segregation law in the South was passed by a Democratic legislature, signed by a Democratic governor, and enforced by Democratic officials. The Nuremberg team carefully studied these laws that were mainly aimed at blacks and used them to formulate their own racist legislation mainly aimed at Jews.
++++++ Six Confederate Generals were founders of the KKK. All DEMOCRATS.
Let’s see for example: George Washington Gordon (October 5, 1836 – August 9, 1911) was a general in the Confederate States Army during the American Civil War.
Gordon was elected as a Democrat to the Sixtieth, Sixty-first, and Sixty-second Congresses. He served from March 4, 1907, until his death in Memphis. He was interred in Elmwood Cemetery.
Gordon was railroad commissioner, just what Vanderbilt (Railroad Mogul) needed to expand his empire. Just what Rockefeller needed to access the exploring and transportation Petroleum areas in the South.
What Rockefeller needed was a War, not only to win, but to kill as many Land lords in the South to then start the reconstruction and obviously the expropiation of key lands for Petroleum extraction.
Rockefeller needed those six Generals.
Continue >> Click to Six Generals
Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
In the other hand Republicans were the ones who originally proposed an amendment abolishing slavery in 1863 such as:
James Mitchell Ashley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Mitchell_Ashley
The Radical Republican: The Radical Republicans were a faction of American politicians within the Republican Party of the United States from around 1854 (before the American Civil War) until the end of Reconstruction in 1877. They called themselves “Radicals” and were opposed during the War by the Moderate Republicans (led by President Abraham Lincoln), by the conservative Republicans, and the largely pro-slavery and later anti-Reconstruction Democratic Party, as well as by conservatives in the South and liberals in the North during Reconstruction.[1] Radicals led efforts after the war to implement a national standard of citizenship to establish civil rights for former slaves and fully implement emancipation. After weaker measures resulted in 1866 violence against former slaves in the rebel states, Radicals pushed the 14th Amendment through Congress. They disfavored allowing ex-Confederates officers to retake political power in the south, and emphasized equality, civil rights, and voting rights for the “freedmen” (recently freed slaves).
Read:
Belz, Herman. A New Birth of Freedom: The Republican Party and Freedom Rights, 1861 to 1866 (2000)
Civil Rights Act of 1866
The Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27-30, enacted April 9, 1866, was the first United States federal law to define citizenship and affirm that all citizens are equally protected by the law. It was mainly intended to protect the civil rights of persons of African descent born in or brought to the U.S., in the wake of the American Civil War. This legislation was enacted by Congress in 1865 but vetoed by President Andrew Johnson. In April 1866 Congress again passed the bill. Although Johnson again vetoed it, a two-thirds majority in each chamber overcame the veto and the bill therefore became law.
John Bingham and some other congressmen argued that Congress did not yet have sufficient constitutional power to enact this law. Following passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, Congress reenacted the 1866 Act in 1870.
The Six Generals:
++++ Nathan Bedford Forrest (July 13, 1821 – October 29, 1877), called Bedford Forrest in his lifetime, was a lieutenant general in the Confederate Army during the American Civil War.
Forrest (a Democrat) was elected a Memphis city alderman. Forrest supported his mother and put his younger brothers through college. By the time the American Civil War started in 1861, he had become a millionaire and one of the richest men in the South, having amassed a “personal fortune that he claimed was worth $1.5 million”.
Another DEMOCRAT who became traitor to the South, but a convenient associate to Vanderbilt and Rockefeller.
The 1868 Democratic National Convention was held at Tammany Hall in New York City. The slogan for the 1868 Democratic National Convention was, “This is a white man’s country, Let a white man rule”.
The Convention: Andrew Johnson, Winfield Scott Hancock, Sanford Church, Asa Packer, Joel Parker, James E. English, James Rood Doolittle, and Thomas A. Hendricks.
The front-runner in the early balloting was George H. Pendleton.
Let’s see again:
Hitler got his ideas from the white man, or from the North Americans. Yet it was the Democratic Party under its founder, Andrew Jackson, and then under Jackson’s Democratic successors, that massacred the Indians and drove them west and presided over the ignominious Trail of Tears.
The 1868 Democratic National Convention was held at Tammany Hall in New York City. The slogan for the 1868 Democratic National Convention was, “This is a white man’s country, Let a white man rule”.
++ Andrew Johnson (KKK white Supremacist and DEMOCRAT): Johnson became president as he was vice president at the time of the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. A very convenient act, because Democrats declared Lincoln got too many radical ideas as the removing of slavery.
Johnson sought to eliminate rebel influence in the state. He demanded loyalty oaths from public officials, and shut down all newspapers owned by Confederate sympathizers (a great idea then used by HITLER, Media Control).
++ Winfield Scott Hancock (KKK and Democratic candidate for President of the United States, 1880): Union general in the American Civil War. Hancock participated in the military Reconstruction of the South and the Army’s presence at the Western frontier.
++ Sanford E. Church (KKK and DEMOCRAT PARTY): During the Civil War, Church “vilified the Lincoln administration for seeking to ‘absorb, centralize and consolidate the rights and powers of the loyal States in the general government.
++ Asa Packer (KKK and DEMOCRAT PARTY): Railroad Executive.
++ Joel Parker (KKK and DEMOCRAT PARTY): He was nominated for governor by the Democratic Party in 1862, and ran as a “War Democrat” who supported a military solution to the American Civil War rather than accommodation of the Confederacy. 20th Governor of New Jersey from 1863 to 1866, and again from 1872 to 1875.
++ George H. Pendleton (KKK and DEMOCRAT PARTY): Democratic nominee for Vice President of the United States in 1864.
G. Pendleton, During the Civil War he emerged as a leader of the Copperheads, a group of Democrats who favored peace with the Confederacy. After the war, he opposed the Thirteenth Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866.
++ James E. English (KKK and DEMOCRAT PARTY): English was elected as a Democrat to the Thirty-seventh and Thirty-eighth Congresses, serving from March 4, 1861 to March 3, 1865.[3] He was not a candidate for renomination in 1864.
++ James Rood Doolittle (KKK and DEMOCRAT PARTY): was an American politician who served as a senator from Wisconsin from March 4, 1857, to March 4, 1869. He was a strong supporter of President Abraham Lincoln’s administration during the American Civil War.
++ Thomas A. Hendricks (KKK and DEMOCRAT PARTY): In 1855 the pro-Filibuster President Franklin Pierce appointed Hendricks as commissioner of the General Land Office in Washington, D.C.
In the other hand:
Republicans organized militia units to break up the Klan. In 1871, the Ku Klux Act passed Congress, authorizing President Ulysses S. Grant to use military force to suppress the KKK.
KKK is based in Pagan, Satanic cults, and anti Judeo-Christian therefore KKK are the liberals, the ones against Conservationists.
Southern Democrats formed organizations that violently intimidated blacks and Republicans who tried to win political power.
The most prominent of these, the Ku Klux Klan, was formed in Pulaski, Tennessee, in 1865. Originally founded as a social club for former Confederate soldiers, the Klan evolved into a terrorist organization. It would be responsible for thousands of deaths, and would help to weaken the political power of Southern blacks and Republicans.
Racist activity in the South often took the form of riots that targeted blacks and Republicans. In 1866, a quarrel between whites and black ex-soldiers erupted into a full-fledged riot in Memphis, Tennessee. White policemen assisted the mobs in their violent rampage through the black sections of town. By the time the violence ended, 46 people were dead, 70 more were wounded, and numerous churches and schools had been burned. Just two months later, on July 30, a similar outbreak of violence erupted in New Orleans. This time, a white mob attacked the attendees of a black suffrage convention, killing 37 blacks and three whites who allied with them.
In this violent atmosphere, the Ku Klux Klan grew in size and strength. By 1868, the Klan had evolved into a hooded terrorist organization that its members called “The Invisible Empire of the South.” The reorganized Klan’s first leader, or “Grand Wizard,” was Nathan Bedford Forrest, who had been a Confederate general during the Civil War.
In the 1868 presidential election, Republican Ulysses S. Grant won the office with the slogan, “Let Us Have Peace.”
Republicans also won a majority in Congress. Many Northerners, disgusted by Klan violence, lent their support to the Fifteenth Amendment, which gave the vote to black men in every state, and the First Reconstruction Act of 1867, which placed harsher restrictions on the South and closely regulated the formation of their new governments.
Former Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest was the KKK’s first grand wizard; in 1869
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/grant-kkk/
First KKK founded in Pulaski, Tennessee, sometime between December 1865 and August 1866 by six former officers of the Confederate army.
Second KKK In 1915, the second Klan was founded in Atlanta, Georgia. Starting in 1921: anti-Catholicism, anti-Jew and anti-nativism. (That is pure fascism)
Third KKK 1950s and 1960s, bombing of the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham in 1963. Radicalism and Terrorism (DEMOCRATS for the new era, New World Order)
http://www.history.com/topics/ku-klux-klan
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gordon_(Civil_War_General)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Johnson
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winfield_Scott_Hancock
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_E._Church
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asa_Packer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Parker
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_H._Pendleton
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_E._English
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Rood_Doolittle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_A._Hendricks
The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thirteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
The Thirteenth Amendment (Amendment XIII) to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. In Congress, it was passed by the Senate on April 8, 1864, and by the House on January 31, 1865. The amendment was ratified by the required number of states on December 6, 1865. On December 18, 1865, Secretary of State William H. Seward proclaimed its adoption. It was the first of the three Reconstruction Amendments adopted following the American Civil War.
The Civil Rights Act of 1866
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1866
The Civil Rights Act of 1866, 14 Stat. 27-30, enacted April 9, 1866, was the first United States federal law to define citizenship and affirm that all citizens are equally protected by the law. It was mainly intended to protect the civil rights of persons of African descent born in or brought to the U.S., in the wake of the American Civil War.[2] This legislation was enacted by Congress in 1865 but vetoed by President Andrew Johnson. In April 1866 Congress again passed the bill. Although Johnson again vetoed it, a two-thirds majority in each chamber overcame the veto and the bill therefore became law.
John Bingham and some other congressmen argued that Congress did not yet have sufficient constitutional power to enact this law. Following passage of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868, Congress reenacted the 1866 Act in 1870.
Democrats and NAZI Ideology:
“What socialism, fascism and other ideologies of the left have in common is an assumption that some very wise people — like themselves — need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the rest of us, and impose those decisions by government fiat” he continued. Many in the American media at the time praised Hitler, and expressed optimism at his rise to power.
Fascists, instead of seizing the means of production, would allow private ownership of resources only insofar as the state implicitly controlled the means of production through taxation, regulations, price and wage controls etc. all in pursuit of the “national interest.” In short, fascism was technically a shift to the right.
“So, yes, sure fascism was seen as being to the “right” of Communism, because it was. Even Trotsky considered fascism to be right-wing socialism or middle-class socialism. It seems to me that the key word there is socialism, which is properly understood as a phenomenon of the Left” writes Jonah Goldberg at National Review.
Despite the strong central government, authoritarianism, and a planned economy required under fascism, many in the media still describe Nazism and fascism as “right-wing.” The New York Times described the neo-Nazis and other white supremacists as “far right” groups. The Washington Post followed suit along with many other media outlets referring to Charlottesville as “right-wing” violence.”
The media often refers to conservative politicians and pundits as “right-wing” giving the impression that Nazism, fascism, or white nationalism is somehow on the same side of the political spectrum.
“Back in the 1920s, however, when fascism was a new political development, it was widely — and correctly — regarded as being on the political left” writes economist Dr. Thomas Sowell. “Even Hitler, who adopted fascist ideas in the 1920s, was seen by some, including W.E.B. Du Bois, as a man of the left”
https://www.willricciardella.com/media-keeps-referring-neo-nazis-fascism-right-wing-theyre-not/
DEMOCRAT ICONS like Founder of Street Radicalism:
The important thing is not the cause, but the power, for it we must take any cause, whatever it is to the STREET and radicalize it.
From the book and manual of every socialist and every democrat:
“RULES for the RADICALS” by Saul Alinsky.
Thesis: Hillary Rodham Clinton, today: Hillary Clinton ..
The point is how did Ortega carry chaos to the streets to twist the power in his favor.
So do not impose if everyone is wrong, the important thing is that SOROS use their millions and pay so many types of radicals and put them all on the streets, so bounce the Government of Trump.
The objective of the socialist, the radical, is to take power, the radical way is always a violent way. Problem solving is a non-radical problem.
http://www.democracynow.org/2017/8/16/antifa_a_look_at_the_antifascist
SAUL ALINSKY found fertile successors: Hillary Rodham Clinton and her Thesis in 1971 and GYÖRGY SCHWARTZ, BETTER KNOWN TO THE WORLD AS GEORGE SOROS, WAS BORN AUGUST 12, 1930 IN HUNGARY. SOROS’ FATHER, TIVADAR, WAS A FERVENT PRACTITIONER OF THE ESPERANTO LANGUAGE INVENTED IN 1887, AND DESIGNED TO BE THE FIRST GLOBAL LANGUAGE, FREE OF ANY NATIONAL IDENTITY. THE SCHWARTZ’S, WHO WERE NON-PRACTICING JEWS, CHANGED THE FAMILY NAME TO SOROS, IN ORDER TO FACILITATE ASSIMILATION INTO THE GENTILE POPULATION, AS THE NAZIS SPREAD INTO HUNGARY DURING THE 1930S
During an interview with “Sixty Minute’s” Steve Kroft, Soros was asked about his “best year.”
GEORGE SOROS INTERVIEW WHERE HE ADMITTED HE WAS A NAZI COLLABORATOR:
He was only to happy to admit his collaboration with the Nazis,in fact, he called those days the “best time of my life”. Click to watch, in context, that startling confession.
KROFT: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were his adopted godson.
SOROS: Yes. Yes.
KROFT: Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from your fellow Jews, friends and neighbors.
SOROS: Yes. That’s right. Yes.
KROFT: I mean, that sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many, years. Was it difficult?
SOROS: No, not at all. Not at all, I rather enjoyed it.
KROFT: No feelings of guilt?
SOROS: No, only feelings of absolute power.
T
he Justice vs all types of left:
Justice: “Equality before the law” State law is based on the correct application of justice.
Communism: “The total control of the State over the law, total control over the individual” Socialism: “The equality of resources distributed between lso below, because the OWNERS of the State have the Status to control everything to their own wealth.”
Progressive: “Use NAZI propaganda to voluntarily get people to vote to elect an elite group to have ALL power” Progressive is a despotic State, changes the methodology, which is based on the promotion of everyone’s emotions so that Involve with your heart what should judge the mind using the BRAIN.
Progressiveness as described by ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE in 1835: It is a SOFT SWELL, it is a soft tyranny, THE Mild despotism. The end of the republic comes when the Government realizes that it can use the public funds (of the State) to bribe the public and so they vote without knowing in favor of the interests and prejudices of the current Government.
“The tyranny of democracy consists in the majority voting for something they do not understand.” There is the power of the SOCIAL-DEMOCRATS, the so-called progressive today.
LIBERALISM arose with the SDR in Germany in 1863 and were once declared Marxists.
Social Democracy has two branches of the DEMOCRAT party, the same as that of 1971 with Hillary Rodham-Clinton HRC, introduces his thesis based on the Rules for the Radicals of Saul Alijsky that together with Devid Horowitz (both Jews, non-Catholics) take the Ideological basis of the Party and that Horowitz himself declared: “The Communist Party of USA is the Democrat, I know because I did it.”
The second version of Social Democracy is the one created by the NAZIS WW2 post, in 1949 Konrad Adenauer and Hermann Abs, former Minister of Finance NAZI created the European Economic Cooperation League today US , And the Socialist International was always part of its ideological center.
SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT. It arises from the same origin, the Socialist International. Angela Merkel, Germany, NAZI, Social Democrats, Marxists, all come from Germany as Allgemeiner Deutscher Arbeiterverein, ADAV), founded in 1863: the NAZI movement is a branch of the Social_Democratic_Party_of_Germany.
SPD is a branch of:
# 1. The Allgemeiner Deutscher Arbeiterverein, ADAV
# 2. Sozialdemokratische Arbeiterpartei Deutschlands, SDAP
# 3. Sozialistische Arbeiterpartei Deutschlands, SAPD
# 4. Independent Social Democratic Party of Germany and later Communist Party of Germany The SPD functions as Socialist Party of the German Unit or SED.
And today with MERKEL (IM Erika) runs as a whole union with the Christian Democratic Union. The SPD is a member of the Party of European Socialists and of the Socialist International and became a founding member of the Progressive Alliance on May 22, 2013.
Founded in 1863, the SPD is the oldest existing political party represented in the German Parliament and was one of the first parties of Marxist influence in the world. The General Association of German Workers (Allgemeiner Deutscher Arbeiterverein, ADAV), founded in 1863.
Democrats and the Left Mentality:
That was the theme of Horowitz’s speech as he continued: how the communists had taken over the Democratic Party. “The communist party is the Democratic Party,” Horowitz stated. “In The Great Gatsby, [F. Scott] Fitzgerald describes the rich as people who break things and leave them for others to clean up. That is a wonderful description of the left.”
Horowitz, who began as a radical Marxist, said that the modern left had learned stealth from their failures in the 1960s.
Second, Horowitz said, the left are characterized by the belief that “history is a forward march.” Obama, Horowitz claimed, is a deep believer in this concept, all the way down to his carpet in the Oval Office, which assures those who enter that the moral arc of the universe bends toward justice. “Leftism is a crypto-religion,” he explained. “They see themselves as a savior. People who believe that redemption will take place in this life and I will be a part of it, that’s Hitler. That’s Mao…That’s the American left.”
Third, Horowitz said that the left was characterized by “alienation from this country… What weakens America is actually good.” Horowitz cited the Obama administration’s eager withdrawal from Iraq as evidence of that proposition: “Obama betrayed every American who gave their life for the people of Iraq.” He also slammed the Obama administration with regard to Benghazi: “Benghazi is the most shameful act in the history of the American presidency.”
Finally, said Horowitz, the American left “lie. And it’s not like politicians spinning…you cannot be a leftist without lying about the most basic strategic facts about who you are.”
Horowitz summed up pessimistically: “We are within reach of a totalitarian state in this country…These are very very dark days for this country.” But, Horowitz held out hope: “there’s been an earthquake on the conservative side since I switched sides…the tea party is the earthquake. The best thing that Republicans can do is stop the fratricide.”
Finally: The Democrats and The Rules for the Radicals.
The Path for the power coming from the people on the streets.
Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals is the last book published in 1971 by activist and writer Saul D. Alinsky shorltly before his death. His goal for the Rules for Radicals was to create a guide for future community organizers to use in uniting low-income communities, or “Have-Nots”, in order for them to gain social, political, legal and economic power. Within it, Alinsky compiled the lessons he had learned throughout his experiences of community organizing from 1939–1971 and targeted these lessons at the current, new generation of radicals.
Rules for Radicals has various themes. Among them is his use of symbol construction to strengthen the unity within an organization. He would draw on loyalty to a particular church or religious affiliation to create a structured organization with which to operate.
The reason being that symbols by which communities could identify themselves created structured organizations that were easier to mobilize in implementing direct action. Once the community was united behind a common symbol, Alinsky would find a common enemy for the community to be united against. Such as LGBT, or BLM or NAZI.
The use of common enemy against a community was another theme of Rules for Radicals, with nonviolent conflict as a uniting element in communities.
Alinsky would find an external antagonist to turn into a “common enemy” (for example President Donald Trump) for the community within which he was operating. Often, this would be a local politician or agency that had some involvement with activity concerning the community. Once the enemy was established, the community would come together in opposition of it. This management of conflict heightened awareness within the community as to the similarities its members shared as well as what differentiated them from those outside of their organization. The use of conflict also allowed for the goal of the group to be clearly defined. With an established external antagonist, the community’s goal would be to defeat that enemy.
Symbol construction helped to promote structured organization, which allowed for nonviolent conflict through another element in Alinsky’s teaching, direct action. Direct action created conflict situations that further established the unity of the community and promoted the accomplishment of achieving the community’s goal of defeating their common enemy. It also brought issues the community was battling to the public eye. Alinsky encouraged over-the-top public demonstrations throughout Rules for Radicals that could not be ignored, and these tactics enabled his organization to progress their goals faster than through normal bureaucratic processes.
Lastly, the main theme throughout Rules for Radicals and Alinsky’s work was empowerment of the poor. Alinsky used symbol construction and nonviolent conflict to create a structured organization with a clearly defined goal that could take direct action against a common enemy. At this point, Alinsky would withdraw from the organization to allow their progress to be powered by the community itself. This empowered the organizations to create change.
The rules
- “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.” Power is derived from 2 main sources – money and people. “Have-Nots” must build power from flesh and blood.
- “Never go outside the expertise of your people.” It results in confusion, fear and retreat. Feeling secure adds to the backbone of anyone.
- “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy.” Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty.
- “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules.
- “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
- “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones.
- “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news.
- “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
- “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist.
- “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.” It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.
- “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog.
- “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.” Never let the enemy score points because you’re caught without a solution to the problem.
- “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
USA Politics - Politica Latinoamerica 