Israel discriminated by the UN and Netanyahu gives lesson to Kerry

European countries are afraid of suffering terrorist attacks if it is perceived that are not sufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause. LIE. The idea is GLOBAL CONTROL.

In Venezuela put the opposition leaders in jail and then the Government ignores UN orders to release them. How can then have a seat? Venezuela behaves like the judge, when in fact it is the criminal. Nonsense! I hope that countries like Argentina to use their vote at the UN to be the voice of the victims who suffer abuse daily.

Costa Rica a consolidated democracy back by leaps and bounds with SOLIS and shows sympathy with all totalitarian regimes and emits no opposition or opinion or action on the NO ELECTIONS in Nicaragua Ortega, and ALBA Maduro, but Solis shows his ideological force communist ALBA aligned and money that you have received personally.

The aim was to transform the Israeli government a narrow right-wing coalition in a centrist unity government with Herzog as chancellor. Reportedly, the momentum of the talks was an effort by Secretary of State John Kerry, diplomatic Quartet representative Tony Blair and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to push Herzog in the arms of Netanyahu.

Netanyahu was able to attract rightist Avigdor Lieberman and his Yisrael Beiteinu party in the coalition. That gave greater stability majority of seven votes, while gets rid of a minister of defense was proving to be a problem.

That was game, set and match Netanyahu and other hard lesson for Kerry arrogant and his chief of Obama, they should have learned in the last seven years or more that the prime minister is always able to run rings around them when is this sort of thing.

European countries are afraid of suffering terrorist attacks if it is perceived that are not sufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause. LIE.
The idea is GLOBAL CONTROL.
Who is the most dangerous?
#1. North Korea with its nuclear tests?
#2. ISIS and attacks within Europe and USA?
#3. DEMOCRATS USA with their governments invading countries?
#4. Russia has the most powerful army and invade any country?
#5. Israel, the only democracy in the Middle East?
# 6. Other?

Independent of its response, the UN has given Syria a resolution on a case resolution on Myanmar [Burma], and perhaps Iran, or perhaps one on North Korea. ALL OTHER 20 resolutions have been passed against Israel. THAT’S DISCRIMINATION GUIDED by design.
I think there are a variety of reasons. One is the exchange of vows. It is known that Islamic countries exchanged vows and all other countries want to have the 66 votes of the Islamic group for its own purposes.

Israel only offered to exchange one vote. So is 66 to 1. There is also the question of oil. Islamic and Arab countries still have large oil reserves. There SWFs, and countries like Saudi Arabia and Qatar control billions of dollars of these funds.

The other countries want to track this money and benefit somehow Billionaire flow. All this is a factor in influencing the vote of other countries. Moreover, among these factors realpolitik, is also the fear of terrorism. European countries are afraid of suffering terrorist attacks if it is perceived that are not sufficiently supportive of the Palestinian cause.
While clowns UN have left Fidel Castro to make his record as Ortega and Chavez and Maduro that about extending saying anything, and repeating each other the same phrases over and over again with the same dialectic, everything ends in a large aPPLAUSE Council of the UN.

While UN Watch interventions are frequently interrupted by the president table, diplomats, for people trying to put obstacles so that you do not speak, or not to finish their speeches. I want to ask about your relationship with the people of the UN in Geneva. How is the back room? How to treat it? Do you consider above all a nuisance?

On the other hand, it is very clear that dictators hate us, like the Syrians and North Koreans, because we bring victims of their regimes. UN Watch is very active bringing the victims of these regimes to testify before the UN and global media. So, it is natural that dictators hate us.

A Muslim countries do not like us because we denounce attacks against Israel and its agenda to promote Islamic views. Appeal to a cultural card to protect themselves from criticism, making any discussion of radical Islam in the UN is taboo.
There is a classic scene in the first Star Wars film, when Luke and Obi-Wan Kenobi enter a cantina and are all these weird characters. One of these becomes violent and Obi-Wan have to draw his sword and confront him. Well, when we entered the UN, they are all these rare creatures, speaking different languages and putting faces and happens in that scene. That’s how I feel when I walk in the halls of the UN.

All we ask is that the UN do what he promised he would do. We have the Human Rights Council, which is the main body responsible for promoting human rights. This council has the responsibility to train with countries with solid human rights record, but actually the opposite happens.

In fact, its members elected China, Russia, Cuba, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela … countries that crush human rights. Which the President SOLIS and PAC are very happy to support dictatorial regimes of criminal order, because it gives them a lot of money to Costa Rica have Side of VENEZUELA is like saying to the world, SEE WE HAVE REASON.

Netanyahu was able to lure Avigdor Lieberman and his right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu Party into the coalition. That gave him a more stable seven-vote majority while also getting rid of a defense minister who was proving to be a problem.

That was game, set, and match for Netanyahu and another hard lesson for the arrogant Kerry and his boss Obama, who should have learned in the last seven-plus years that the prime minister is always able to run rings around them when it comes to this sort of thing.

The goal was to transform Israel’s government from a narrow right-wing coalition into a centrist unity government with Herzog as foreign minister. Reportedly, the impetus for the talks was an effort by Secretary of State John Kerry, diplomatic Quartet representative Tony Blair, and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to push Herzog into Netanyahu’s arms.But, like so many other ham-handed U.S.-led attempts to game Israel’s democratic system, it didn’t merely fail. It actually led to an even worse outcome from the point of view of State Department peace processors.

Rather than a unity government with a pliable foreign minister, Netanyahu used Herzog for leverage in talks with another party. The result was that Herzog was humiliated. Instead of a narrow right-wing government with only a one-vote edge in the Knesset, Netanyahu was able to lure Avigdor Lieberman and his right-wing Yisrael Beiteinu Party into the coalition. That gave him a more stable seven-vote majority while also getting rid of a defense minister who was proving to be a problem.

That was game, set, and match for Netanyahu and another hard lesson for the arrogant Kerry and his boss Obama, who should have learned in the last seven-plus years that the prime minister is always able to run rings around them when it comes to this sort of thing.The pattern repeated itself in subsequent years as Obama picked pointless fights with the Israeli over settlements, the 1967 lines and Jerusalem.

Each spat was an attempt to weaken Netanyahu, but it always backfired as the prime minister gained domestic popularity by standing up to Washington especially on consensus issues like Jerusalem.

Kerry is not just any fool; he’s a uniquely clueless diplomat with little understanding of the ins and outs of Israeli coalition politics and no interest in learning from his mistakes.It’s possible that Netanyahu seriously considered adding Herzog to his Cabinet which leads to the second lesson that Obama, Kerry, and Blair haven’t learned: the political balance of power in Israel has already shifted to the point where no one, not even Herzog was likely to do what they wanted.

Even if Herzog had become foreign minister it wouldn’t have created the opening that Kerry wanted because everyone in Israel (though no one in the Obama administration) knows that the goal of the Palestinian Authority is to avoid being pushed into talks where they would be forced to either accept a peace they don’t want or to say no to yet another Israeli offer of statehood.

Netanyahu had other priorities, namely dumping a defense minister in Moshe Yaalon who recently seemed to align himself with talkative generals who have been making speeches that seemed to question the prime minister’s control of the government and his policies.

That’s why, as another Haaretz report noted, he preferred a deal with Lieberman, a man he regards as a personal enemy, to one with the more likable Herzog. Though the two despise each other, unleashing the tough-minded Lieberman on the Defense Ministry will put an end to generals playing politics while also strengthening the coalition. But neither Kerry nor Blair nor the in-over-his-head Herzog saw that coming or that their gambit would actually backfire on them.

The Israeli consensus on peace remains solid, and he now has a more stable government with which to stand up to Western pressure for the next two or three years. Herzog, the most likely alternative to him as prime minister, has just been demolished along with his party’s reputation and prospects as a result of the failed coalition negotiations.

And he knows that the Palestinians will always refuse to make peace no matter how much the U.S. tilts the diplomatic playing field in their direction.The lesson here is one that both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, and whoever it is that winds up as the next secretary of state should take to heart.

No matter how much Americans may think they can push the Jewish state around or use their out-sized influence to intervene in Israeli politics, their ability to do so is illusory. Whether they like Netanyahu or not, no U.S. official is going to be able to outfox him on his home turf. Trying to do so is a fool’s errand as Kerry has proved time and again. His successor should wise up and avoid making the same mistake.